Spider-Man 3 Movie Poster

Spider-Man 3

User rating: 3.07 398 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: May 4, 2007

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Thriller | 2h 20m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.07/5

User rating: 3.07

Based on 9820 votes and 398 reviews.


  • User rating: 473 33.10%
  • User rating: 118 8.26%
  • User rating: 272 19.03%
  • User rating: 168 11.76%
  • User rating: 398 27.85%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 381-390 of 398 reviews

User rating: May 4, 2007

Great Visuals, Good Action, and pretty much nothing else. The plot and dialogue was extremely cheesy/corny. So many scenes made you groan and have to look away. If you know Spiderman at all, then this movie is definitely not the for you. The crowds seemed to love it though with lots of cheering and clapping. If you wanted to make a satirical spoof on Spiderman, this is the movie you'd make. "I'll smack you in the mouth, I'm Peter Parker! "

User rating: May 4, 2007

This is the best one in the series. The story special effects were good. Venom is a little dissapointing but Tobey shows why he show stay as the web slinger. Kirsten Dunst shows why she's crappy again. But James Franco and Thomas Hayden Church are sick as well. After the boring part 2 this one comes back with a vengence

User rating: May 4, 2007

What a cheesy piece of crap. Too much going on, the Topher Grace villiam storyline was rushed into the last 30 minutes of the movie. When it was trying to be sad it was funny, when it was trying to be clever it was chessy. What a terrible end to the Spider-Man trilogy... I beg them not to make a fourth if this is what they think a good movie is. I know you will all see it because it's Spider-Man but be prepared for a terrible movie.Also Tobey McGuire can not fake cry!!!!

User rating: May 4, 2007

I saw Spider-Man 3 at a midnight showing at the theater in my town, I thought the movie was okay but not as good as the other ones, I've seen the other Spider-Man movies and visually they were better, the scripts were better and the plots were better. the visual effects are the only good thing about this movie(but questionable), the acting was better then the previous movies but, this Spider-Man is more of a womans movie than a comic book movie, almost half of the movie has someone or many people crying in the scene and after awhile it gets very agitating. The fight scenes in this movie were spread out through the movie, there were less of them, there should have been more, Venom was hardly

User rating: May 4, 2007

Meh.

User rating: May 4, 2007

What were they thinking, did anyone making this movie not see the final result.. My SPIDY sence is going off not too see this flick

User rating: May 4, 2007

I just can't seem to get past Topher Grace's 70's show character when he plays venom. They should've used someone who actually has a build and looks more sinister. That way I wouldn't be cracking up the entire time picturing Venom saying "uhhh dad?...Donna's pregnant.."

User rating: May 4, 2007

spider-man is a big crybaby in this film

User rating: May 4, 2007

Pretty slow :(

User rating: May 4, 2007

the best movie i ever seen. It better than second movie and somewhat first movie. Well done movie. I enjoyed it very well. they all should get the awards again.