The Other Boleyn Girl Movie Poster

The Other Boleyn Girl

User rating: 4.03 43 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: February 29, 2008

PG-13 | Drama, Romance | 1h 55m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.03/5

User rating: 4.03

Based on 790 votes and 43 reviews.


  • User rating: 134 54.69%
  • User rating: 46 18.78%
  • User rating: 28 11.43%
  • User rating: 13 5.31%
  • User rating: 24 9.80%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 11-20 of 43 reviews

User rating: March 23, 2008

I loved this movie! I didn't want it to end. Buying it as soon as it comes out to DVD, and i might just go watch it again!

User rating: March 23, 2008

very good movie, with great performances by all, especially Portman an Scarlett.

User rating: March 22, 2008

The best medieval movie I've seen!

User rating: March 22, 2008

Terribly disappointing, but I would certainly overlook the historic discrepancies if this film was in the least bit entertaining. Little to no character building of a very interesting and torn Henry in his mid-years. Kristen Scott Thomas turned in a great job for a small role, the only believable and memorable one for me.

User rating: March 19, 2008

I really enjoyed this movie! Better than I had anticipated. I would see it again!

User rating: March 19, 2008

Historically incompetent as was the book. If you know nothing about history you may enjoy it for the costumes. My friend fell asleep. Too bad producers say "Hey here's a best seller lets make a movie. Try doing some research.

User rating: March 19, 2008

Tho based on "historical fiction" the movie captured the sexism that existed at the time. It also showed the subtle softer side of henry who was in a panic to produce a son esp. after the War of the Roses. Katherine's character should have been older as she was older than H8. Natalie Portman was fantastic and Scarlett J also very good. If you know even a little about Eng. history this is a terific movie to see. It speaks to much of our own history.

User rating: March 17, 2008

Definitely a must see. Amazing job in Cinematography and Costuming.

User rating: March 13, 2008

I thought the movie was well done. As for being historically inaccurate, it is based on a book that is knowingly inaccurate. It did provide some good insight into how life may have been at the time. I think that Natalie Portman did an excellent job a portraying a vixen, and Scarlett Johannson played an excellent innocent young woman. I do not believe they were miscast at all.

User rating: March 12, 2008

Eric Bana and Scarlett Johansson are very believable in the rolls that they play, at points i didn't buy what Natalie Portman selling. All in all however it was a movie worth seeing