Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

User rating: 4.44 475 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: June 4, 2004

PG | Fantasy, Family, Sci-Fi | 2h 22m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.44/5

User rating: 4.44

Based on 30894 votes and 475 reviews.


  • User rating: 25430 82.81%
  • User rating: 715 2.33%
  • User rating: 356 1.16%
  • User rating: 1092 3.56%
  • User rating: 3115 10.14%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 451-460 of 475 reviews

User rating: June 4, 2004

i think it was rlly adventurous and freaky.... but it was ok and some parts are kind of funny!!!!!!

User rating: June 4, 2004

i was dissapointed, but it was still a good movie. 1)they shouldn`d have made them wear regular clothes, it kind of runied the effect 2)the new actor who plays dumbledoor didn`t charaterise enough, he taked to easily, he wasn`t as "brethy" and the old actor, which gave him his rustic, old likem wise way about him 3)they said the movie is a lot "darker"..when they said this i thought they ment a deep kind of darkness, but they were literal..the movie was very dark as in the picture was darker. it was as dull as black and white, but somhow they captured the darkness of black and white in a colored film. it lost its magic anyways..i`m a cri

User rating: June 4, 2004

Did not like the new Director..

User rating: June 4, 2004

I think it is the best movie ever thats at least what I think.

User rating: June 4, 2004

I was expecting this movie to be great but sadly I have been disappointed by it greatly. Not every indy director is as talented as Quentin... this movie sux way too much, the shooting technique is horrible. In some scenes, characters in the background are totally distorted. Plus the cutting was bad as hell. People haven`t read it won`t have any idea what the plot is suppose to be. Why did they have to change the director? This guy should go be to direct R-rated Indy film ( I am not joking here. If you look up the bios of the director, that is the only film he ever directed.)

User rating: June 4, 2004

Makes me realize that it was only meant for kids....and not people in their twenties.

User rating: June 4, 2004

Ten times better than the last two. Clean cut, fast past with some surprises of its own. Give this movie a chance!

User rating: June 4, 2004

We think that this movie was probably the worst out of the three made. It had good graphics/effects but we thought that the end was horrible, and the going back in time part did not make any sense.ok well we would have to give this three out of five stars.

User rating: June 4, 2004

Great!! Best one yet!!

User rating: June 4, 2004

it was amazing I loved it and you will too