G.I. Joe: Retaliation Movie Poster

G.I. Joe: Retaliation

User rating: 3.49 49 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: March 28, 2013

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi | 1h 50m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.49/5

User rating: 3.49

Based on 184 votes and 49 reviews.


  • User rating: 86 48.31%
  • User rating: 20 11.24%
  • User rating: 16 8.99%
  • User rating: 8 4.49%
  • User rating: 48 26.97%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 11-20 of 49 reviews

User rating: April 17, 2013

Crap! Brainless crap. Well-suited for the impaired of mind and persons with an IQ of 50 and lower.

User rating: April 12, 2013

Do not waist your money I felt like I was watching a power rangers cartoon The plot was poorly written and confuseing The 3d was hard on the eyes the hole movie was stuped I don't know how they got the rock and bruce willis ot even read the script let alone star in it!

User rating: April 12, 2013

I would give this a 3.5, but they don't give you this choice. Not bad, but I found it not a G.I. Joe movie, but a Rock and Bruce Willis action movie that happened to have Joe characters in it. Thank God thye didn't give up Snakeeyes

User rating: April 10, 2013

This movie was absolutely horrible. The only saving grace was the special effects and a few of the action scenes. The storyline is not remotely plausible - all countries launching their nuclear warheads at the same time, then self destructing them in mid flight. The script seemed like it was written by a teenager in a hurry to finish their homework so they could go out and smoke up some more. The acting was so cheesy and subpar (due to the poorly written script and ridiculous storyline). I would have giving the first GI Joe a 6/10. This second GI Joe gets a GENEROUS 2/10 from me.

User rating: April 10, 2013

It was good to pretty good. One reviewer said the movie in 3D almost ruined it for him. Me too!! I didn't like it in 3D. This type of movie is Not suited to Be in 3D at all!! Another reviewer said they didnt like Mr. Channing in it. Neither did I. How many movies has he been in the last few years?? WOW. I go to a movie if he's in it. BUT would you please hire someone else who needs a job, more than him!! Thank you.

User rating: April 8, 2013

The action was good, but the story was total crap. Didn't make any sense. A weak story line. No country in the world launches all it nuke at the same time and then destroy it as well. That was so immature.

User rating: April 6, 2013

ok

User rating: April 3, 2013

Yes the movie has changed from the first one. But they continue of where they left from the first. What more do you want from this plot. If most of you guys enjoyed watching this movie that is great news. If some of you guys who didn't like this movie that is your opinion. I enjoyed watching this movie because it had action packed from the beginning to the end. There is nothing wrong with this movie, they add some new characters in this movie which was fine. I think roadblock team was better off with channing tatum character. The old cast from the first one, some of them didn't wanted to be in the second one.

User rating: April 3, 2013

Bruce Willis at his best!

User rating: April 3, 2013

Good movie, but a little dissapointed, it doesn't really follow with the first movie. In the first, they had an underground base with many Joe's, in the second they get killed from ground level and by saying all the joe's are gone? yea like that makes sense, the Director change the whole plot, Drake and the girl from the first should have been kept. Sometimes I wonder, I am not a movie writter but will think better then them, from a huge movie fan.