In Theaters: March 19, 2004
Based on 14884 votes and 121 reviews.
Horror for imbeciles. An insult to Romero's original masterpiece. And Sarah Polley is one of the worst actresses ever.
Pointless and not scary. Romero's original was about a depraved consumer culture run amok. What better example of that than pointless movie remakes? The fact that this was even remade indicates that the makers of this film either couldn't grasp Romero's none-to-subtle theme or were too greedy to care.
Great movie, I liked it a lot, I heard part 2 is in talks, I hope they make part 2
extremly well done.
Movie is explosively good, I was hoping there would be part 2,Please make part 2
I loved this movie! I`ve seen it at least 10 times (I lost count). It has a great cast, great story and wicked zombies. The fact that the zombies run is freaky! It was wonderful to see great Canadian talents like Sarah Polley and Jane Eastman. Michael Kelly is hot and I hope to see him in more films in the future. I totally recommend this movie to everyone.
THIS MOVIE IS INTENSE
For all of those who commented that you never find out how the zombies were created... Why would that make the film any better? You know exactly as much as the characters in the film know. All any of these characters could have would be vague theories. Besides, if you look at Romero`s original works, the only one in which an explanation for the zombies is given is the original... and these days that explanation is laughable, at best! Any explanation would alienate some group of viewers due to ethical, religious, scientific, or other beliefs. Watch the film, and get immersed in what is happening. You don`t need writers spoon-feeding ever
I thought thies movie was very intense.
this movie was absolutley horrible..not funny, no beginning or ending...worst ever