Cloverfield Movie Poster

Cloverfield

User rating: 3.18 287 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: January 18, 2008

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi, Thriller | 1h 24m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.18/5

User rating: 3.18

Based on 1616 votes and 287 reviews.


  • User rating: 218 43.43%
  • User rating: 47 9.36%
  • User rating: 21 4.18%
  • User rating: 40 7.97%
  • User rating: 176 35.06%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 41-50 of 287 reviews

User rating: February 15, 2008

Worst movie ever, don't waste your money on this piece of c....

User rating: February 15, 2008

awesome

User rating: February 11, 2008

Thought this movie was awesome!!!!!! For those that said there was no action/special effects...what the hell were you watching?!?!?!

User rating: February 11, 2008

This kind of trash shouldnt be allowed on the big screen anyone who liked it has a severe mental dissability

User rating: February 8, 2008

I actually quite... Loved this movie. I can understand, though, why some people disliked it. The idea of not showing the monster a lot, and such, and such, quite entertained me. The really creepy and eerie things about it are what I really liked, though. Such as the eerie way it's been centred around terrorism, and it's post-9/11 setting. The way it had no soundtrack was also interesting, too. Except for the whole party mix. Which had MUCC's song 'Fuzz', which I loved. More love for J-Rock from American movies, whooo~. Also the whole ending credits thing. That's what gave me the chills. How the movie ended in a puzzling way, making you wonder things. Then the total silence through out the fi

User rating: February 7, 2008

Wake up people. When the method of telling a story becomes the story, the red flashing lights should go off. There will be no plot, no character developement, no message, no story!!!If you think so, then they should be handing out Academy awards on U Tube in the near future, say a 100 years or so. NOT.The best way to hide everthing that was lacking including the poor TGI. is to use a shaky camera. By the way for the novice film people, it was not really shot on a camcorder.Brillant way to "shake" a few dollars out of everyones pocket. Stick around for #2.Bring the Air Sickness pills this time and have another real good time. LOL.

User rating: February 7, 2008

Good movie overall if you can stand the motion sickness. It would probably have been a great movie and reached a greater audience if not for the constant wild shaking of the camera. I hope they make Cloverfield 2 from the military perspective, with an actual camera with built in stabilizers and clean crisp imagery none of that terrible nauseating camera work.

User rating: February 6, 2008

In response to the morons who feel the movie is original...Well...You people don't watch alot of movies do you? This movie was a rip off of at least two other movies and it has no originality whatsoever...The storyline was terrible as was the CGI...Save yourself the time and money and DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE.

User rating: February 5, 2008

It's terrible!!! Use the money for something more useful. Something better could have been done with the story. And lets not talk about the end of the movie, honestly I wanted my money back when I saw the way the movie ended. The way it was filmed with one camera, to make realistic was a terrible decision, it's annoying, and doesn't let you understand what's happening. Terrible movie!!!

User rating: February 4, 2008

Scary, real and original, great film, if your looking for something different this movie has great special effects that look realistic without over doing it, its not going to win any awards, but this is the type of movie that was meant to be seen on the big screen, check it out - The Methos