Catwoman Movie Poster

Catwoman

User rating: 3.93 97 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: July 23, 2004

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Drama | 1h 44m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.93/5

User rating: 3.93

Based on 39506 votes and 97 reviews.


  • User rating: 27945 70.80%
  • User rating: 758 1.92%
  • User rating: 464 1.18%
  • User rating: 796 2.02%
  • User rating: 9508 24.09%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 41-50 of 97 reviews

User rating: August 11, 2004

I never read the comic books, so I went in with an open mind and enjoyed it. It was a female empowering movie - and unlike others, I won`t stoop to degrading those who decided they did not enjoy the movie, but will allow everyone the free will to make their own choice. If anything, it was worth it just to see Hallie Berry in her outfit!

User rating: August 10, 2004

Whoever said Catwoman was good must be high or sumthin that was the WORST movie ever!!!!!!!!I can`t beleive they would even make a mvoie like that. I waisted 16 bucks on a stupid movie I will never watch again...That movie was just a stupid excuse for Halle Berry to show some skin...looks like i should`ve gone with the movie critects on this one!!! HALF A STAR!!!

User rating: August 7, 2004

The people who voted 5 stars should not have disposable income.

User rating: August 7, 2004

They butchered the classic character of Selina Kyle a.k.a. Catwoman with this Patience Phillips girl...Halle Berry should stick to Storm from X-Men. Note being a comic book fan I know what I`m saying(writing) but she didn`t do such a good job brining either of those characters from the comics to the screen.

User rating: August 3, 2004

I wonder what movie some of these movie gowers are watching? but i can tell you it is not CATWOMAN! CATWOMAN is definately better than Bourne Supremacy, all the action is bourne trying to escape, I got bored after 40 mins. Hower CATWOMAN was action all through very good script, these movie knockers need to admit women super heroes are here to stay. VERY VERY GOOD MOVIE! Stop knocking the movie compared to SPIDERMAN,SPIDERMAN 2 is bull it make`s no sense, lets be honest with ourself here,only because it`s women super hero why there is so much negetive reviews.

User rating: August 3, 2004

it was a horible replica.. if thats what they were trying to do. this comic was good until now.. as im concerned it ruined the reputation of halle berry.actually i was so disapointed that i walked out of the theatre. and as i was walking out i tohught to myself... i cant belive i jutrs payed 7 dollars to see some woman crawl and jump and run around in a little tight black leather suit. this movie was horrible. 1 STAR

User rating: August 3, 2004

The only good thing about this movie is Halle Berry in tight ripped leather.

User rating: August 2, 2004

i luved this movie soooo much i liked how she became cat woman!!!!! it was 1 of the best films i`ve ever saw and i`ve seen alot

User rating: August 2, 2004

This movie is a poor version of a character who has been around for more than half a century. [It is also a thinly veiled excuse to see Halle Berry show some skin and then tries to put a plot around it.] Although big screen adaptations of comic book characters are altered slightly, this one is so far from the "real" Catwoman it is ridiculous. Selina Kyle debuted in 1940 as the Cat, but donned the identity of the Catwoman soon after. She has been Catwoman ever since. This movie is basicly a loosely based remake of the "Batman Returns" Catwoman, which one may note, was still Selina Kyle. If you want campy, watered down Catwoman "

User rating: August 1, 2004

Ummm it was okay I guess but it was just like all the other comic book movies and it was nothing really new..