Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones Movie Poster

Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones

User rating: 4.42 456 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: May 16, 2002

PG | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Drama, Sci-Fi | 2h 22m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.42/5

User rating: 4.42

Based on 34286 votes and 456 reviews.


  • User rating: 27700 80.82%
  • User rating: 1736 5.07%
  • User rating: 425 1.24%
  • User rating: 327 0.95%
  • User rating: 4085 11.92%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 421-430 of 456 reviews

User rating: May 16, 2002

"An entertainment so in love with its overinflated mythology that it no longer recognizes the needs of moviegoers for real characters and compelling plots." -- Robert W. Butler, KANSAS CITY STAR

User rating: May 16, 2002

This film is for immature movie goers - and unintelligent ones.

User rating: May 16, 2002

I`ve matured as a movie goer...so after watching INTELLIGENT films [great writing, great acting] like The Usual Suspects, Memento, A Beautiful Mind, Mulholland Dr - it`s VERY difficult to sit through special effects B films like this one. Mr Lucas, I would like to see how skilled you are at making a film that DOES NOT HAVE a blue screen background anywhere in it.

User rating: May 16, 2002

"Millions of dollars heaped upon a project of such vast proportions need to reap more rewards than spiffy bluescreen technique and stylish weaponry." -- Jeanne Aufmuth, AUFMUTH.COM

User rating: May 16, 2002

"Millions of dollars heaped upon a project of such vast proportions need to reap more rewards than spiffy bluescreen technique and stylish weaponry." -- Jeanne Aufmuth, AUFMUTH.COM

User rating: May 16, 2002

An entertainment so in love with its overinflated mythology that it no longer recognizes the needs of moviegoers for real characters and compelling plots." -- Robert W. Butler, KANSAS CITY STAR

User rating: May 16, 2002

best star wars movie, Yoda and Fett rule

User rating: May 16, 2002

It was the coolest movie in the 20th century!!!!!!!!!!!! But Queen of the Damned is better, no offecnce. I may be a vampire cause I have a bite and VAMPIRES ROCK! And Star Wars do too. :D

User rating: May 16, 2002

Alas, perhaps my opinion is a bit biased as I expect nothing less than perfection from Lucas, and being realistic there is no way that he can rekindle the fire he helped spark in the minds of many in the 70’s. Also a word to the wise if you want to spend money to watch this feature film, make sure you watch it on a screen that provides superior sound and digital photography, as this movie was meant to be shown on such screens (AMC) also to the side note Natalie Portman was stunningly hot in this movie. Therefore, I must admit for an average movie watcher and for a person who could care less from the star wars saga, by all means go watch it as

User rating: May 16, 2002

Attack of the clones: perhaps a more accurate and benevolent name given to this movie could have been “ The attack of horrible dialogues, flat acting and unimpressive chemistry”. Don’t let my enthusiasm spoil it for you, because as you can tell the movie was clearly better than its predecessor, however failed to come close to the magical, imaginative and monumental success of episodes 4,5 and 6. Personally I believe no matter what I say, the one million or so fans will go watch this movie regardless and so be it, after all there are some moments in the movie that actually seemed believable and worth watching. Without giving much away Yoda alo