Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

User rating: 4.44 475 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: June 4, 2004

PG | Fantasy, Family, Sci-Fi | 2h 22m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.44/5

User rating: 4.44

Based on 30894 votes and 475 reviews.


  • User rating: 25430 82.81%
  • User rating: 715 2.33%
  • User rating: 356 1.16%
  • User rating: 1092 3.56%
  • User rating: 3115 10.14%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 391-400 of 475 reviews

User rating: June 6, 2004

The direction didn`t capture the plot and moods like the last, you can tell almost the second it starts that it`s a different preson leading the movie...I thought this movie was a half-rate just because of that.

User rating: June 6, 2004

This is one of the best movies ever. Really Really Good!

User rating: June 6, 2004

Wonderful, but the book contained so many details that were missed and filled in the rest of the story. It seemed a little more rushed. The format was different but then again the format of the book changed in book 3. Was there more than one whomping willow?? Or did they just change the location?

User rating: June 6, 2004

The movie is great as it covers a lot in 2 hrs & 20mins. Still, many parts from the novel are missing in the movie. People who have not read the books may have hard time to follow with what`s happening in the movie

User rating: June 6, 2004

I really really liked this movie. It had a much darker side, so it was scary! I thought that they should have made the new Dumbledore look more like the old one, but besides that everything was great!!! I can`t wait to see it again!!!

User rating: June 6, 2004

I thought that Harry Potter [and the Prisoner of Azkaban] was a good movie but was sort of "rushed". But then again, if they were to include every good detail from the book, it would be a 4 hour movie and think of how long the 4th and 5th movies would be if that was the case. However, I felt that a slight addition to some scenes (like Quidditch and the Shrieking Shack scenes) would add more effect into the film. Overall, I thought it was an exceptional film. The cast has grown into portraying their roles more adequately; specifically Daniel Radcliffe. I thought he did a phenomenal job and being faced with the role of Harry Potter, a fictional

User rating: June 6, 2004

its short.

User rating: June 6, 2004

It was very different from the other two. STILL it was amazing, Less Magic and Myth, to it and more Mystery and Suspense. I can`t wait till number 4!!! It`s a definit "Must See". :D

User rating: June 6, 2004

it was a great movie.it was so good im thinking of going to see it again

User rating: June 6, 2004

I LOVED IT!!!!