Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.44/5

User rating: 4.44

Based on 30894 votes and 475 reviews.


  • User rating: 25430 82.81%
  • User rating: 715 2.33%
  • User rating: 356 1.16%
  • User rating: 1092 3.56%
  • User rating: 3115 10.14%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 351-360 of 475 reviews

User rating: June 8, 2004

DIRECTOR SUCKED!!!!!!!!!! Not only was it entirely different from the book but they changed 3 main characters and the location of the Womping willow from the previous movies. Director spent to much time with special effects and scenery then sticking to the first two excellent movies. POOR, POOR JOB on this movie hopefully its back to the way it was for the first two when they make the fourth.

User rating: June 8, 2004

I thought this movie was well made! The story was well told but a lot of important details were left out!

User rating: June 7, 2004

The movie as a whole was good. However, I don`t think this director went in for as much detail as Chris Columbus did. Also I think they could have done a better job at casting Professor Dumbledore. I don`t think Michael Gambon fit the part. They should have tried to find someone that looked & sounded more like Richard Harris. To me Michael Gambon just seemed to be walking through the part. No real emotion there. I hope they replace him in the next one.

User rating: June 7, 2004

I think it is the best yet. I sat enthralled the whole time. The kids have grown up some and their talent has doubled. I loved it!!! Amy - Ontario

User rating: June 7, 2004

this movie was the worst of the 3 so far the director sucked so bad they changed the movie from the book so much more then the frist 2 movies did

User rating: June 7, 2004

I was very disappointed. Too much was left out of the book. If you love the book and have read it more than once don`t go see this movie. You will be disappointed.

User rating: June 7, 2004

I went into this film with high expectations- they were shattered. Most people I went with had not read the books, and for some parts of the movie, were lost. Some of the best parts of the book were left out, and i found myself getting bored because, unlike the other two movies, this one just couldnt hold my attention. If you enjoyed the book, save yourself the grief and do not watch the movie.

User rating: June 7, 2004

This was the best Harry Potter movie so far, the director had a wonderful insight into the Harry Potter world. The story was rewritten in certain places, (and we all knew it would have to be), but the plot kept a flow that highlighted the most important aspects of the third book, as well as strengthening the importance of the friendship between the main three characters. Dumbledore was sensationally true to the energetic, wise and somewhat quirky character he is in the novels. It was bloody brilliant! Five stars!

User rating: June 7, 2004

Overall the movie was pretty good, yet there were many parts that were deleted in the movie which was in the book.

User rating: June 7, 2004

i loved the artistic bits of the movie...that`s what really set apart this harry potter film from the other two. and i loved the fact that the characters aren`t just children anymore...they`ve grown a bit, gotten deeper. but maybe it`s cuz i`m about their age, and i can relate to this film more than the other two.