Rambo Movie Poster

Rambo

User rating: 3.65 145 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: January 25, 2008

R | Action, Adventure, Drama, Thriller | 1h 33m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.65/5

User rating: 3.65

Based on 22180 votes and 145 reviews.


  • User rating: 5646 61.68%
  • User rating: 548 5.99%
  • User rating: 22 0.24%
  • User rating: 17 0.19%
  • User rating: 2920 31.90%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 61-70 of 145 reviews

User rating: January 30, 2008

Wow all i got to say is how horrible this film was and i do agree with that one dude who said it was overrated..

User rating: January 30, 2008

Well a lot of people seem to love this film but i thought it was retarded as a Rambo fan i found myself watching part 3 all over again expect this was more gory and more action scene..However it lacked character,performance and realistic action....

User rating: January 30, 2008

Nothing original here accept the fact that their are body parts flying everywhere lol.. Don't get me wrong i like those kinda stuff but this film just makes it lame for the lack of performance,lack of story-line and chessy lines.. Sorry but this film gets a one out of me!!!

User rating: January 30, 2008

Rambo is Back for the last time..for those who did not like the movie, you have to be a RAMBO fan to like it, i enjoyed every single second of it, to me the original (first blood) is still my number one, but this is much better than part 2 and 3 combined!! if you like RAMBO & Stallone, go there and see rambo! u won't regrit it. This is by far my best movie this winter! btw, i'm going again this friday! :)

User rating: January 30, 2008

JOHN RAMBO's LONG ROAD BACK John Rambo is back -- and so, more importantly, is Sylvester Stallone, the artist and filmmaker. With RAMBO and last year's triumphant ROCKY BALBOA, Stallone has reclaimed the respect and admiration accorded him early in his career, when his performance as a down-on-his-luck prize fighter from Philadelphia inspired comparisons to Brando and his attendant screenplay was praised for its gritty realism and fragile romanticism. There is plenty of the former and precious little of the latter in the brutal landscape Stallone has committed to celluloid with RAMBO, but that's as it should be; this isn't a live-action cartoon -- it's a nasty, grim, and uncompromisin

User rating: January 29, 2008

HONESTLY REALLY GOOD MOVIE. SURPASSED MY EXPECTATIONS, I LOVE THE RAMBO TRILOGY, AND THIS DIDN'T DISAPPIONT. INSTENSE ACTION 5 STARS

User rating: January 29, 2008

Basically, non-stop graphic violence...bullets through heads, arrows through heads, torture, sadism, disembowelments, gang rapes etc, etc. It's hard to understand today's movie makers psyche; do you really need to make a movie that represents total degradation of the human body and mind? What is really bothersome, is that at one time I loved this type of crap; tonight I walked out on some of these scenes. (would've left if I'd not been with friends) R.A.N.

User rating: January 29, 2008

I see someone started to rate this film a over-rated flick and I have to agree.. Being a fan and all this was the worse Rambo... Nothing original,point-less flick,and horrible acting and performance I ever seen...The only thing i like about this film was the gore anyone here will tell you that "what made this film and that was the gore" sadly that's the truth!!!

User rating: January 29, 2008

Well i can't say it's the horrible out of the three but it's up there though, I agree with a lot of you! the second one was much better Rambo then this one!!!

User rating: January 29, 2008

You get everything you expect from a Rambo movie and ten times the gore. Don't really see the point of this overrrated sequel.