Thank you for rating this movie!

3.26/5

User rating: 3.26

Based on 16515 votes and 263 reviews.


  • User rating: 7368 47.23%
  • User rating: 1757 11.26%
  • User rating: 175 1.12%
  • User rating: 143 0.92%
  • User rating: 6157 39.47%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 61-70 of 263 reviews

User rating: December 17, 2004

You cannot have a movie based entirely on battle scenes. There has to be a little bit of character development. This movie is not for shallow people who only go to movies to see action or to laugh. It is the story of one of history`s greatest people. It is a colossal undertaking to rectreate the life of Alexander on the big screen in three hours. Keep all of this in mind before saying this was a bad movie.

User rating: December 17, 2004

First of all most of you people have to learn how to write and spell. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Secondly, the movie was quite accurate, you must allow Hollywood to make a few minor changes...I mean they never made a historical movie that was 100% accurate. Furhtermore, homosexuality and bisexuality were very common in Greek culture during the period in which Alexander lived, the loser who said that it was common in France obviously knows nothing about history and should start reading a little before making any comments. Great battle scenes.

User rating: December 16, 2004

I gave this movie a 1 Star because I couldn`t give it anything lower. The rampant homo-eroticism and the complete disregard for anything historical makes the movie deviate away from what Alexander the Great truly was. And that wasn`t a homo that enojoyed watching dancing other homos. P.S. I hate you Oliver Stone.

User rating: December 16, 2004

i paid to see a movie, not a history lesson. on most parts historically accurate, angelina was amazing...everything else was not. i actually considered demanding a refund from the manager because this movie was so bad. i recommended it to all my friends so they can suffer and cringe like i did.

User rating: December 16, 2004

Where are the battle scenes? First time I walked out on a movie. This is also first time I post my comments here.

User rating: December 15, 2004

Over 3 hours of aboslute garbage. Could have easiliy been jammed into 2 hours. If you`re looking for a Braveheart or Troy here don`t bother. It was rotten. Not even worth renting. First time I almost ever had to leave the theatre because I was so bored.

User rating: December 15, 2004

This film presents an intense psychological investigation of the character of Alexander of Macedon.the war scenary is great. I agree that colin might not be as charming as Alexander was, but the scenary, the fighting scene, is worth the ticket.

User rating: December 15, 2004

so nice and entertainer

User rating: December 15, 2004

99.99% correct and accurate! most events in the film are historically correct, such as taming the horse, his boyfriend died of Typiods, and his death,i also felt his relation with hephaistion was beyond homosexualiy and i was more a soul relation i`m not lesbian but angelina looked so hot : )

User rating: December 15, 2004

alexander the Great was an excellent movie and well portrayed. I have a problem with people claiming that it was in accurate and provide no support as to how it`s inacurate. I`m sure that Oliver Stone did do research for this movie, This film presents an intense psychological investigation of the character of Alexander of Macedon.the war scenary is great. I agree that colin might not be as charming as Alexander was, but the scenary, the fighting scene, is worth the ticket. I don`t know much about his conquest territory. However, most events in the film are historically correct, such as taming the horse, his boyfriend died of Typiods, and his