Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

User rating: 4.48 643 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: November 18, 2005

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Family, Sci-Fi | 2h 36m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.48/5

User rating: 4.48

Based on 9367 votes and 643 reviews.


  • User rating: 3493 77.24%
  • User rating: 476 10.53%
  • User rating: 146 3.23%
  • User rating: 67 1.48%
  • User rating: 340 7.52%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 411-420 of 643 reviews

User rating: November 24, 2005

I thought that this was THE BEST MOVIE!! so far!! I mean, come on! its Harry Potter, stop ranting on about how badly done the movie was, how bad the director was, and shut up! Honestly, this movie was as close to the book as you can get! Director did an EXCELLENT! job, he was te closest to the book than the last one, it was almost as close as the first two. ( amazing as well) I just think that Dumbledore isn`t good. And man oh man oh man, did Harry, Ron and Krum look gooood! Wow! LOL anyways this film is a must see, and if you truley are a Harry Potter fan, then stop critising and ENJOY!!

User rating: November 24, 2005

IT`S THE BEST MOVE IN THE WORLD

User rating: November 24, 2005

Staying true to J.K Rowlings vision. I know a movie is great when the movie matches my own visions when reading the book. I think to my self wait did I already see this. Nope just read it. Great job. Love the new director and can hardly wait for Order of the Phonix.

User rating: November 24, 2005

I believe that the movie was very well done. There were parts left out but that was expected, considering the book was so long. The character development between Ron, Harry, and Hermione was true to the book. People who are angry that parts were missing don`t quite understand how difficult it must have been to widdle the story down to two and a half hours, if all was included the movie would have been atleast four hours. I look forward to the next film and the magic that comes with it.

User rating: November 24, 2005

wot a great film, excellent special effects, great actors......wot about the story, where was the mention of our beloved house elfs, and wot about bertha jorkins and her dissaperance and ludo bagman and blackmail from the twins, i mean come on warner bros but these are the lighter side to the story that make the books such fantastic reading.

User rating: November 24, 2005

by far the best movie in the series, and whoever says its the directors fault that it was so different from the book ur stupid, its the freaking screen writer. but it was still a really good movie.*****/***** Emma Watson is so HHHHHHOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!

User rating: November 23, 2005

Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort was the best! Dan radcliffe`s acting really improved. Awesome movie!

User rating: November 23, 2005

BRILLIANT AND AWESOME!!!!Except that this movie had loads of missing parts like rita skeeter`s secret of being an animagus, the disappearance of dobby and winky,the part of giving a thousand galleons to harry and how he gives it to the weasley twins. And also the prior incanitum is supposed to make harry and voldemort rise up .The wrong fact that neville gives harry the gillyweed instead of dobby.The missing part of the weighing of the wands ceremony. But besides these missing parts,it was FANTASTIC. Especially the 1st and 2nd task. It was WONDERFUL!!!!

User rating: November 23, 2005

I believe that Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the best yet! I am an incredible fan of the Harry Potter books as well as the movies. The mixture of humour, sad n scary moments was the work of a brilliant artist! Although harry, ron n hermione are everyone`s favourites... i would say that Cedric did an extremely well job... I loved him the most!

User rating: November 23, 2005

The movie is boring and is dark........I fell asleep at least 5 times. I liked the past 3 H.P. better!!!!!!!