Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Movie Poster

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

User rating: 4.48 643 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: November 18, 2005

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Family, Sci-Fi | 2h 36m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.48/5

User rating: 4.48

Based on 9367 votes and 643 reviews.


  • User rating: 3493 77.24%
  • User rating: 476 10.53%
  • User rating: 146 3.23%
  • User rating: 67 1.48%
  • User rating: 340 7.52%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 331-340 of 643 reviews

User rating: November 29, 2005

I think I expected more out of this film that I actually got, but besides that, the movie was visually amazing and I enjoyed it a lot more than the third film.

User rating: November 29, 2005

I was rather disappointed by this movie. Definitely not my favourite of the four, mainly because they ruined my favourite character for me by choosing the wrong actor to play the new Dumbledore. He obviously didn`t read the books, since he didn`t understand the character at all! They cut out a lot out of the book and changed some of the story in order for it to make sense, but I guess that it`s understandable due to the time constraint. I liked how they introduced a lot of new characters (although some of them didn`t look the way I imagined), but that just meant that each of them only appeared in about two scenes. Very poor character devel

User rating: November 29, 2005

everyone here that loves this movie are just a bunch of young dimwits that either are enfatuated with daniel or emma or the kid that plays ron.... and not into the actual harry potter story... for the true potter fans, this movie was a dissapointment, no Dursleys, no Winkie or Dobby, the Yule ball was a joke --> it was too modern... to normal... these characters are soon to be powerful wizards and witches, and apparntly Mike Newell forgot about that aspect of the story, he potrayed the hogwarts student body as a bunch of average teenagers..., also and most dissapoiinting was Dumbledore!!! Dumbledor`s character in the film was far from the all

User rating: November 28, 2005

I really enjoyed the story of this movie but found the ending rushed and weak. I left the theatre unsatisfied.

User rating: November 28, 2005

personally i dont like alot of animation. i think it makes the film look bad... but i like the really, really, realistic animations but they should act it out as much as they could. harry hermoine and the weasley boy should remember though, that just because they are in the series for good they cant rush through the acting or do it half-assed.

User rating: November 28, 2005

AMAZING!

User rating: November 28, 2005

amazing

User rating: November 28, 2005

HP4 was simply the best HP movie made to date. The scenes I had imagined in my head from reading the book were 1000x more fantastic on screen. The "scary" scenes in the book I found more scary on screen actually, and this is great how the director can achieve that without turning this into a 18a horror flick. Other scenes were amazing as well, from the gigantic Quidditch World Cup stadium, to the elegant, classy entrances made by the Beauxbaton/Durmstrang students...however I felt the workmanship shrunk a bit towards the ending. I thought the final task and the showdown with Voldemort would take up more time, but it was still stunning neve

User rating: November 28, 2005

This was an EXCELLENT movie!! Even though I didn`t read the book, I still understood what went on!! From my understanding, there is more to the book then what`s in the movie. But it was just EXCELLENT. I HIGHLY recommend watching it. I can`t wait until #5...

User rating: November 28, 2005

It a good movies