The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey Movie Poster

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

User rating: 4.38 85 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: December 14, 2012

PG-13 | Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci-Fi | 2h 49m

Thank you for rating this movie!

4.38/5

User rating: 4.38

Based on 304 votes and 85 reviews.


  • User rating: 196 72.59%
  • User rating: 26 9.63%
  • User rating: 22 8.15%
  • User rating: 6 2.22%
  • User rating: 20 7.41%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 51-60 of 85 reviews

User rating: December 18, 2012

Great movie, but TOTALLY UNESSASAIRLY DRAGGED ON. And to think there will be TWO more movies on The Hobbit. It shouldn't take 2 more movies to finish the Hobbit. Got too boring, not because its a children's book or what most people complain about it's because it was just dragged on. Filming Children of Huren or something else from Tolkien's lore would of been a better bet.

User rating: December 18, 2012

Much better than RETURN OF THE KING. Martin Freeman seems assured of another Oscar nomination for his fine work here.

User rating: December 17, 2012

So bad I left the theatre. It was so boring, the cinematography was cheap, bad story and acting terrible. It looks like a movie for cable. Sorry but I loved the LOTR movies but this is garbage compare to it. I just wasted $17 for 3D AVX.

User rating: December 17, 2012

The movie was good. It wasn't horrible but it wasn't amazing. It was just good; watchable. Richard Armitage was my favourite in the movie. Bilbo was annoying and it was a bit slow moving and some parts dragged on too long. But worth watching and the graphics were good.

User rating: December 17, 2012

Waste of time. Best thing was the popcorn.

User rating: December 17, 2012

Amazing movie, people who gave 3 or less stars are all crazy lol

User rating: December 17, 2012

The effects are amazing, especially Smaug, the most ferocious, most believable movie dragon since REIGN OF FIRE. 5/5

User rating: December 17, 2012

Suneagle's review cont.... You need a certain look to up keep the original feeling music and flow from the master peices of LOTR. Anyhow that being said the movie still held fantastic scenery and fantastic battle scenes and is still one heck of a fantastic Fantasy flick. Enjoy. Avx 3D no high frame. 48frms for a different movie no problem but it was used completely incorrectly sorry Peter. Love ya bud Thx for the experience though :)

User rating: December 17, 2012

Suneagle's Review 4*'s. sorry I rate LOTR 5/5 but Hobbit took too many unnecessary risks. From shooting in 35mm FILM in LOTR to now in digital 48frms and 3D was too much of a leap into a new vision for audiences to adjust too. 3D was a good choice but 48frames was so pristine crisp that movies are still way to far back to make anything look that good. The graphics and detail of the movie needed to be beyond 100% to handle 48frms and not to mention the acting my god the acting. Once the film switched to its original 24frms it faired MUCH MUCH better and once Golem who is the best actor in the film came to play it started to look believable other than fake, phony, and funny B rated style. You

User rating: December 16, 2012

Excellant!!!!