In the Cut Movie Poster

In the Cut

User rating: 3.21 25 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: October 22, 2003

R | Thriller | 2h 0m

Thank you for rating this movie!


User rating: 3.21

Based on 1583 votes and 25 reviews.

  • User rating: 794 50.16%
  • User rating: 38 2.40%
  • User rating: 64 4.04%
  • User rating: 79 4.99%
  • User rating: 608 38.41%

Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?

Showing 1-10 of 25 reviews

User rating: February 25, 2023

Terrible. It might have worked if the cast a strong male actor against Ryan instead of the pathetic beta simp hate monger Ruffalo. His wimpiness is infuriating.

User rating: November 15, 2005


User rating: August 2, 2005

Too much wierd symbolism mad the movie hard to stay with. Good to see Meg expand her screen personna to this almost soft-core effort. Poor attempt to setup plausible suspects other then the eventual killer. I picked the killer ealry in the film, there was just no reason for the killer to be in the scenes he/she was in. He/She added nothing to the plot advancement other then just being there so he/she could be the killer at the end

User rating: November 29, 2004

Sandly, Meg seemed lost without a strong man to play against. Not up to her ability in this one...

User rating: November 5, 2004

poor movie,my god!!

User rating: July 26, 2004

i nearly feel asleep, boring, what actually happens?

User rating: May 18, 2004

A remarkable film! Truly one of the best films that has graced the screen in a long time. The negative comments expressed by some only shows their lack of intellect.

User rating: May 3, 2004

I thought the Movie was graphic and choppy. There was lots of symbolism, but no real story was revealed. Meg Ryan may be trying to expand her acting roles, but I won`t pay to see another of her movies unless she gets her on screen personality back. Soft porn? yeah pretty much

User rating: April 26, 2004

I agree with all everybody that thinks Mark Ruffalo is hot! Bjut hte movie was hard to follow and way to long. If ti wasn`t for Mark i would of fall to sleep!!!!!

User rating: April 26, 2004

How does this movie get 4 stars when nearly everyone submitting a review panned it?! I can`t imagine why Meg Ryan would choose such to be involved in such a b-grade movie!