Hail, Caesar! Movie Poster

Hail, Caesar!

User rating: 2.31 56 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: February 5, 2016

PG-13 | Comedy | 1h 46m

Thank you for rating this movie!

2.31/5

User rating: 2.31

Based on 152 votes and 56 reviews.


  • User rating: 32 25.81%
  • User rating: 6 4.84%
  • User rating: 4 3.23%
  • User rating: 8 6.45%
  • User rating: 74 59.68%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 1-10 of 56 reviews

User rating: June 15, 2016

I love most of the Cohen brothers films. For a fan of their work, I found the movie very entertaining. I don't understand why there is so much hate towards it. Gross out, slap stick, obvious in your face humour this movie is not. It's original (which is hard to find) and good.

User rating: June 9, 2016

Hard to follow. Watched Zoolander 2 just prior and it was head and shoulders better than that movie, but then again so was "Attack of the Giant Tomatoes"

User rating: April 30, 2016

I gave it a 1 because there is nothing lower then 1. Big disappointment with all the top billing actors. What a waste of time.

User rating: March 30, 2016

OK, maybe not the worst movie that I have ever seen but definitely one of the least entertaining. Probably about as entertaining as a dinner party at the home of some of the people that give it 5 stars and feel compelled to insult the intelligence of those who dare go to the theatre for entertainment purposes. gess itt wuz to intylectul fer mee.

User rating: March 15, 2016

Clooney and the rest of the cast are great. This is a clever inteligent comedy, but, the key word is INTELLIGENT... some of the reviewers on here are just too dumb to realize just how clever this movie is !

User rating: March 13, 2016

You need an IQ of 30 to enjoy this one. BAD!!! no intelligence in this one. How can one of the viewers rate himself so high? I guess it you want to sleep with alright music, which is the only thing on this movie, than go for it. Even the acting was not memorable. Even for free, would this movie be a lost time.

User rating: March 13, 2016

Worse than bad. Poor Clooney does he need so badly the extra money to lend himself for this? No story, poor acting especially Johansson. No smiles, no drama, no thrills.

User rating: March 13, 2016

How can anyone rate this higher than 1? Waste of money all around. Why did they produce it? Why did Clooney play in this poor movie? No idea.

User rating: March 13, 2016

We never liked Johannson and she is really bad here, so is the movie.

User rating: February 28, 2016

Smart and clever. Very well done attention to period details.