Alone in the Dark Movie Poster

Alone in the Dark

User rating: 3.41 33 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: January 28, 2005

R | Action, Adventure, Horror | 1h 36m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.41/5

User rating: 3.41

Based on 911 votes and 33 reviews.


  • User rating: 396 54.70%
  • User rating: 28 3.87%
  • User rating: 30 4.14%
  • User rating: 18 2.49%
  • User rating: 252 34.81%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 21-30 of 33 reviews

User rating: January 31, 2005

I would have expected a lot more from Christian Slater. The story was poorly written and directed. Too many gaps and inconsistancies in the story. I love action too but show me a reason behind it. Pointless pointless pointless. "I`ve just been attacked by an invisible beast. I think I`ll go back to work cause this stuff happens to me every day."

User rating: January 31, 2005

Whoever gave the green light for this movie should be fired immediately!!!! What a waste of my time!!

User rating: January 30, 2005

This is not bad movie, for those who like action

User rating: January 30, 2005

Uwe Boll, the director of this monstrosity, is the next Ed Wood. I went to see it as a laugh after the horrendous House of the Dead. The sad thing is the guy hasn`t learned a thing about filmmaking! If Ed Wood himself got the kind of budget Uwe here did, and had access to CGI (BAD CGI), this is what he would have turned out. The fact people are actually swallowing this garbage up (and not in the "it`s so bad it`s good" way, but actually think it`s good) is a reminder as to why movies are so terrible now. It`s just BAD BAD BAD!

User rating: January 29, 2005

This was bad it was time I will never get back it will be something I forget. When you say the name Alone in the Dark I will space out...and say what is that I will act like I never wasted $8.00 on this badass moive why were they in it didn`t no one day this is bad before it even got out I mean come on it just just plain bad....

User rating: January 29, 2005

Really good movie. Not as Horror as I thought it`d be but well worth the money to see.

User rating: January 29, 2005

worst.movie.ever.

User rating: January 29, 2005

My goodness, this movie was awful. Definitely agree with the other comments. The actors, sadly, did not do a superb job in their acting. Their acting was fake, and just too predictable. The movie could have had potential. There are also way too many loop holes and quite a few bloopers I caught! Definitely a CITY-TV flick, and not even a rental. Please save your money and watch something else!

User rating: January 29, 2005

You`re driving home from work one day, and you see a bus full of pre-schoolers skid into a power line and then crash into pet store, which then blows everything up in a fiery blaze. This pretty much symbolizes what this movie was to me, terrible but SO horrendous that I couldn`t look away as I needed to see if it would get worse. Let me tell you it delivered in spades! This movie has everything! Cliched sets, cliched storyline/plot, cliched characters, cliched monsters, and thats just the cliches! From the early but continous spoonfeeding of plot and repetition of words the writers were obviously very proud of themselves for creating, to the

User rating: January 28, 2005

Nothing too exiting about this movie exept Tera Reed looking sexy as usual. Don`t waist your money! I feel bad for Stephen Dorff because he really is a good acter but for some reason he chose to be in a movie this lame!