A History of Violence Movie Poster

A History of Violence

User rating: 3.83 120 Reviews | Write a Review

In Theaters: September 23, 2005

R | Drama, Thriller | 1h 36m

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.83/5

User rating: 3.83

Based on 1750 votes and 120 reviews.


  • User rating: 500 56.88%
  • User rating: 113 12.86%
  • User rating: 58 6.60%
  • User rating: 36 4.10%
  • User rating: 172 19.57%


Please rate between 1 to 5 stars

*How would you rate this movie?



Showing 1-10 of 120 reviews

User rating: July 14, 2018

I loved this movie. It was very entertaining and quite well done. I cant believe some people didn't get it. Top rate flick and great acting

User rating: November 11, 2008

This was an amazing movie...Well done and well acted...Good actors

User rating: July 20, 2007

Thats's absolutely unbelievable how people can say this movie is pathetic and how it is "Garbage". And in fact it was a deep and exciting film which in the end finished quite nicely. 4 Stars.

User rating: June 25, 2006

I can`t believe it took me so long to watch this movie, it a must have in my own private collection!

User rating: April 24, 2006

wow... pathetic. going in to this i expected a deep, intellectual, and entertaining movie. Turned out to be the biggest waste of my money. This movie is absolutley horrible, and completely pointless. it felt... unfinished. like the directors skipped a whole hour of filmming and said "whatever, they wont notice". very disapointed

User rating: April 1, 2006

Garbage! I can`t believe some people actually liked this movie. It was the worst I have seen in a long time. The acting was pathetic, the plot was predictable, it was sooo slow except for the few minutes of sex and violence. When the fikm was over you felt like... `Well is that it"

User rating: March 25, 2006

very well done. gore but tolerable. I heard Bello didn`t get an Oscar nod due to sex scenes, whoever, I scene more explicit sex on HBO shows. All actors were excellent.

User rating: March 20, 2006

This was actually not as bad as I thought it would be. It was pretty interesting. But the sex on the stairs scene was inexcusable. It did nothing to forward the storyline, nothing was resolved as a result, no one changed as a result, it was just a cheap addition to the film because the director wanted to shock. It was obvious that the director is incredibly self indulgent -- I`ve heard he likes to pay homage to his previous films but you know what guy? This was the first film I`ve seen of yours and I`m not the only one, so that stuff may be amusing to you as an in-joke, but if it`s not needed to tell the story, why don`t just pay attention to

User rating: March 15, 2006

this movie makes me braf

User rating: March 14, 2006

Classic Cronenberg